CO129-447 - Governor Sir May - 1918 [1-3] — Page 167

..

ǝ"usofonA

164

PrognoĦ

•

'voaeIIeoxa nuoï oj dravem að "monod efð ovať I

. YчJO

10 n023ansalama aft of saltalen (medmetges des add to zettek možunetxe efð að bra možarotezą Lagel eft to safoned owe ads .SEJOO PLAZMurd ale to noliekbekwt eda to

.8

tom až ponaffeor“ nuoX tali tangan sete otan I Bado tund fod yɗ becaengue avaly odd to thatI sat at banagong I fazowong sff to mantika mkatrašne od požaratong edit to at mablag00-*" of "BY3wod yonelisezi quo! #tivni yilitéosquez

• it to molto thetrut and malbodno To moždarum sit zalum2dzą

matyzadná na nå fast miďmeren IIb tone[[sezë TUOT

t

Sembuh I palasɔnozo ya zaktikudya arated en hebrosoa poy do tw vlanorja að yldadorq bloor nottataglams to emozioa yna JIJ

obboseg på porp ocmweet #u, ¿CITOTFOLD #TTK*• the obbe ̃yijon 04

"O jant jullie „Iamuduruw ton KEDARİKALIŞ-lo edit at 138 193 War of seitlus1f125 #13 93 betoonih piniam el azotlotios est

Ra'altowng dita de quoo to redimuɑ batimti e:id of galwo entra cetažer að a doơm zatiat writ a tars Joat and of boa patata bezaď hajna▼houlb evolzen a da amalt "esto sosiq hivon qkiarendraq otak Blunge tino 1926 writ bas „nolarakma altë në vonot doum af ozoft atmahɔasng wit malwollot emjot ni merit arið yď tam að of ovad ow,mentmaq ratabmad a amoi cont zakruosa yɗ assalq testo to

aid analnu reitnut Jaloq **3 spamug tou Like I

t

Jo theme of amutner à juď agrado omon ograben vnofilbaoo valjulze aruosa Libw obw n'adrso piejantilu uk nožjarasia enoa tadt vild mo,betsokhut mennam adt nl Isonzoð at sasemont na meddle

• no 2 ta tha drut Early?13 at azotlofloa yd soməžbus to fig.27 sit gaibaofxa od as Insoŋory acid of bungat al

the Summary Court Jurisdiction I will deal briefly with the

reasons against it by the Bar as set forth in the Attorney

General's memorandum. I must firstly observe that whilst it

purports to contain the views of nine members of the Bar, only

five of that number ever seriously practise or appear in the

Courts, unless it be to defend prisoners on the nomination of

the Chief Justice at Criminal Sessions. The allegation therefore

in the menordadum "that the Bar has never been more numerous

than at present" although perhaps true in fact, has little or

no practical bearing on the relative position numerically of

counsel and solicitors in Court.

Again the memorandum says "The small cusès which

the proposal would throw into the Summary Court are the very

onses which would be most suitable for Junior members of the

..............and the chief opportunity of getting into

practice would be denied to the Junior members of the Bar".

I have already pointed out that all the ouses whether large or

BET....

The small in Original Jurisdiction are not concentrated in five

Counsel and "the opportunity of getting into practios" is already

denied, if they desire it and certainly some do not, to the

non militant member of the Bar. The transfer therefore of centair

small actions to the Summary Court oould only therefore affect

the five Counsel concerned.

5.

Another objection is put forward that the transfer

7

of Original actions of any magitude must blook the work of the Summary Court, and delay the prompt trial of small actions. Now

it has been my fate for some twelve months to do the work of the

Summary Court whilst the Pužane Judge has been engaged in

hearing a very lengthy action in Original Jurisdiction, which Aging to a previous decision I was debarred from trying. Thie

experience enables me to state that there is ample time available for the disposal of such cases as the proposed soreme would entail Every case is disposed of without delay in the Summary Court. A large proportion of them are settled after a day for the heating